Tags
alma mater, alumni, anderson in, anderson ind, anderson indiana, anderson university, apologetic, apologizing, apology, AU, carmel macchiato, christ, christian, Christianity, college, cross, fundamentalism, god, ironic, jesus, jesus christ, liberal arts, macchiato, modus operandi, religious, right-wing, unapologetic, unapologetically, unapologetically christ-centered, university, venti
About three months ago my alma mater released series of recently produced commercials on YouTube. This one, “AU: Unapologetically Christ-Centered,” was the topic of significant debate and discussion among a number of alumni.
The hang up for many of us was the phrase, “unapologetically Christ-centered.” We reached a general consensus that we all grew and developed in our understandings of faith and Christianity while at Anderson University. This growth was an integral part of our experience, and as such one could say that our experiences at AU were “Christ-centered.” The problem was the word, “unapologetically.” The term was troublesome to many of us because of the connotations and cultural/historical baggage it carries with it. It is often associated with right-wing, religious fundamentalism (three of the top ten results on Google for “unapologetically” fall into this category). However, when one compares AU to other small, Christian, liberal arts universities, the environment at AU is not one of religious, right-wing fundamentalism–or at least it wasn’t when I attended. Many of us felt the commercial misrepresented our experience.
(I’m not sure why this topic–which was put to rest 3 months ago–was running laps in my head 6 minutes after I woke up this morning. I was barely conscious enough to remember that you shave with a razor, not a toothbrush. Maybe I just watched Inception too recently. Anyways.)
I want to take issue once again with the phrase “unapologetically Christ-centered.” The phrase seems to imply that people out there are apologizing for being Christian. Otherwise, there would be no reason to distinguish oneself as unapologetic. Now, I can understand apologizing for Christianity. A quick review of history demonstrates that Christians have committed plenty of horrible deeds. However, that’s not the issue at hand. It doesn’t say “unapologetic, Christ-centered.”
My question is this: Who are all these people who are going around apologizing for being Christian?
I mean, imagine if someone walked into Starbucks and said, “Yeah, I’d like a venti caramel macchiato. Can you put my caramel in the shape of a cross? You know, like God. Sorry, I know it’s an inconvenience, but I’m a Christian.” (Unfortunately, the only part of this story that is fictional is that the person apologized for being a Christian). Nobody does that! I mean, I’ve known a lot of people over the course of my life. Furthermore, I’ve known a disproportionately high number of Christians over the course of my life. I can’t recall a single instance where someone apologized for being a Christian. If enough people are going around apologizing for being Christians that a school needs to differentiate itself as unapologetic, you’d think I would’ve witnessed that apology at least once.
Furthermore, if anyone is apologizing for being Christian, that to me indicates that they have a low self-image. People who are secure in their identity don’t to apologize for who they are. If that’s the case, I don’t think you’ll boost their confidence much by bragging about how unapologetic your are. Way to stomp the little guy while he’s down.
I’m being satirical and ridiculous about this subject, which is not my typical modus operandi. However, I am sincerely trying to imagine someone being apologetically Christ-centered. Somehow every believable scenario comes out ridiculous.
So, why identify oneself as unapologetically Christ-centered, if no one else is apologizing for it?
As an afterthought, does anyone else think the proximity of “unapologetically” and “Christ” is a little ironic? I mean, isn’t seeking forgiveness and reconciliation sort of the central teaching of Jesus Christ? Or is that just me? Yeah? The Bible doesn’t talk about that anywhere? Huh. Coulda sworn it was in there somewhere.
I think on an individual level your insights are true. Yet when it comes to universities, more and more “Christian” colleges are peeling away associations with the church. Coming from an institution, is this their way of apologizing to the world? Colleges like Furman to Princeton have broken formal ties, shifting focus away from Christ toward “broad knowledge” which in-and-of itself isn’t a bad thing at all, but why do you have to abandon the church to seek it? It’s an identity crisis that all Christian colleges face, to stay with the church or part ways. It appears as though AU is reinforcing its Christian mission and ties with the church. “This is who we are and we will not go the way of other colleges.”
limerick,
You raise a good point. It may be a faulty syllogism to equate an individual to an entire institution, although certainly comparisons may be made. I guess the distinction that I’m trying to make in the post is the difference between apologizing for doing something versus apologizing for being something.
I don’t have a problem with individuals or institutions apologizing for things they did. In fact, I appreciate such actions because I think they show humility and integrity. However, apologizing for being a certain way makes me nervous, especially when there’s nothing wrong with that attribute. I don’t think any individual or institution needs to apologize for being Christian.
While some institutions have distanced themselves from their Christian roots, I don’t see any of them apologizing for or denying those roots and that part of their identity. So why distinguish oneself as being unapologetic?